http://randomwire.disqus.com/China, technology & everything inbetweenenFri, 24 Aug 2007 16:57:17 -0000http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/19/analogue-people/#comment-1196344<p>Awww, you've gone and spoilt my fun! I think I dropped enough hints in the paragraph below the video though :P</p>DavidFri, 24 Aug 2007 16:57:17 -0000http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/19/analogue-people/#comment-1196343<p>It's a girl! Not a robot! :P You had me fooled for ages! I don't like you any more! *sticks out tongue*</p><p>:P That's the last time I believe you, Mr [name removed]! :)</p><p>*feels silly*</p>MariaFri, 24 Aug 2007 16:47:28 -0000http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/19/analogue-people/#comment-1196340<p>Yes i was going to say that too :)</p>TomWed, 22 Aug 2007 04:08:19 -0000http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/19/analogue-people/#comment-1196342<p>Nit-picker :P</p>DavidTue, 21 Aug 2007 08:32:07 -0000http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/19/analogue-people/#comment-1196341<p>I think what you call a technological revolution from the '84 onwards I would probably call a revolution in mainstream computing power, seeing as technology in general has been progresing rapidly since the 1700s. Essentially we agree in all but terminology :p</p>TomTue, 21 Aug 2007 04:40:45 -0000http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/19/analogue-people/#comment-1196339<p>I think you have to still make a distinction between the Industrial and Technological revolutions; one concerned heavy industry, whereas the other is less tangible in terms of the raw product. Whilst industrialisation continues we are well beyond the initial "big bang", certainly in the western hemisphere.</p>DavidMon, 20 Aug 2007 05:37:36 -0000http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/19/analogue-people/#comment-1196338<p>I know that we say the Industrial revolution was 18th/19th century, but I don't think you can really argue that the industrial revolution has ended. I think I see it more as evolutionary than revolutionary..</p>TomMon, 20 Aug 2007 05:14:32 -0000