randomwire.com - Latest Comments in Britains Lack of High Speed Trainshttp://randomwire.disqus.com/China, technology & everything inbetweenenFri, 10 Aug 2007 06:00:35 -0000Re: Britains Lack of High Speed Trainshttp://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/08/british-ingenuity/#comment-1196203<p>Agreed, however that fact that there are no commercial supersonic aircraft in operation today is a huge step backwards. I can't think of another example where something potentially revolutionary has been "uninvented".</p>DavidFri, 10 Aug 2007 06:00:35 -0000Re: Britains Lack of High Speed Trainshttp://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/08/british-ingenuity/#comment-1196202<p>£750 million profit ain't too shabby, and a 27 year service life</p>TomFri, 10 Aug 2007 05:01:52 -0000Re: Britains Lack of High Speed Trainshttp://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/08/british-ingenuity/#comment-1196201<p>Lol, and look what happened to them...</p>DavidThu, 09 Aug 2007 09:49:42 -0000Re: Britains Lack of High Speed Trainshttp://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/08/british-ingenuity/#comment-1196200<p>At least we beat the rest of the world at supersonic airliners :)</p>TomThu, 09 Aug 2007 09:28:18 -0000