<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>randomwire.com - Latest Comments in Britains Lack of High Speed Trains</title><link>http://randomwire.disqus.com/</link><description>China, technology &amp; everything inbetween</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:00:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Britains Lack of High Speed Trains</title><link>http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/08/british-ingenuity/#comment-1196203</link><description>Agreed, however that fact that there are no commercial supersonic aircraft in operation today is a huge step backwards. I can't think of another example where something potentially revolutionary has been "uninvented".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">randomwire</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 06:00:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Britains Lack of High Speed Trains</title><link>http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/08/british-ingenuity/#comment-1196202</link><description>£750 million profit ain't too shabby, and a 27 year service life</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 05:01:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Britains Lack of High Speed Trains</title><link>http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/08/british-ingenuity/#comment-1196201</link><description>Lol, and look what happened to them...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">randomwire</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:49:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Britains Lack of High Speed Trains</title><link>http://www.randomwire.com/2007/08/08/british-ingenuity/#comment-1196200</link><description>At least we beat the rest of the world at supersonic airliners :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:28:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>