<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>randomwire.com - Latest Comments in Deferred Success in Schools</title><link>http://randomwire.disqus.com/</link><description>China, technology &amp; everything inbetween</description><atom:link href="https://randomwire.disqus.com/deferred_success_in_schools/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:40:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Deferred Success in Schools</title><link>http://www.randomwire.com/2005/07/20/deferred-success/#comment-1195886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In some ways she has a point or maybe she is describing how exams work, the modular A-levels allow resits if you fail a module meaning if a module is sat early failure really is just temporary until the resit. I am not sure if this good or bad for the education system but it seems to be the way it works now, I am certainly grateful for it. As for the phrasing it is rather stupid but as she said herself she only phrased it like that to get attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kitty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:40:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>